# Claude Code vs Cursor vs Windsurf 2026 — Senior Developer Comparison (1M Context, Composer 2.5, Cascade)

> Source: https://sukruyusufkaya.com/en/blog/claude-code-vs-cursor-vs-windsurf-2026-senior-developer-karsilastirma
> Updated: 2026-05-27T18:13:05.991Z
> Type: blog
> Category: yapay-zeka
**TLDR:** Claude Code (Anthropic), Cursor (Composer 2.5), and Windsurf (Cascade) — the three major AI coding assistants as of May 2026. SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench Pro scores, pricing (Pro $20, Max $200, Cursor Business $40, Windsurf Pro $15), agent modes, hybrid setup recommendations, and adoption guidance for Turkish engineering teams.

<tldr data-summary="[&quot;As of May 2026 the AI coding assistant market has consolidated around three players: Claude Code (Anthropic, CLI), Cursor (IDE, Composer 2.5 model), and Windsurf (formerly Codeium, with the Cascade paradigm).&quot;,&quot;SWE-bench Verified: Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 79.6%, Claude Opus 4.7 hits 82.4% (Anthropic measurement); Cursor Composer 2.5 lands at 71.2%; GPT-5 (OpenAI) at 78.1%.&quot;,&quot;Pricing: Claude Pro $20, Max 5x $100, Max 20x $200. Cursor Hobby Free / Pro $20 / Business $40. Windsurf Pro $15 / Teams $30.&quot;,&quot;There is no single right tool — most senior developers use a **hybrid setup**: Cursor for daily IDE flow, Claude Code in a terminal for heavy multi-file refactor.&quot;,&quot;Adoption for Turkish teams: Cursor + Claude Pro ($40/dev/month) for SMBs; Claude Code Max + Cursor Business (~$240/dev/month) for enterprise.&quot;]" data-one-line="Claude Code (terminal-first agent), Cursor (IDE-first Composer), Windsurf (Cascade flow paradigm) — 2026''s three major AI coding assistants; the right choice depends on team size, task mix, and budget, but a hybrid setup is almost always optimal for senior developers."></tldr>

## 1. Introduction: The 2026 AI Coding Assistant Market Snapshot

Two years ago GitHub Copilot stood alone. As of May 2026 the AI coding assistant market has consolidated around **three main players**:

1. **Claude Code (Anthropic)** — Terminal/CLI, agent-first, 1M context.
2. **Cursor** — VS Code fork, in-house Composer 2.5 model, parallel agent infrastructure.
3. **Windsurf** — Formerly Codeium, rebranded in 2024, differentiated by the **Cascade** flow paradigm.

GitHub Copilot still owns market-share volume (5M+ users) but lost the enterprise senior developer segment to these three. This guide compares them from a real senior-developer perspective: daily workflow, agent capabilities, model selection, pricing, team dynamics.

<definition-box data-term="AI Coding Assistant" data-definition="A tool that integrates an LLM into an IDE or CLI to support code completion, refactor, debugging, documentation, and agent-style tasks. As of 2026 the category splits into three paradigms: in-IDE (Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot), in-terminal (Claude Code, Aider), and hybrid (Continue.dev, Cody)." data-also="AI Code Assistant, AI Pair Programmer"></definition-box>

## 2. Anatomy: Architecture of the Three Tools

### 2.1. Claude Code — Terminal-First Agent

Anthropic shipped Claude Code 1.0 in February 2025 with a radical design that doesn't live inside an IDE. **Command: `claude`.** It launches from a terminal, attaches to the current directory, and has direct access to the file system and git.

**Core capabilities:**
- **1M token context** (with Opus 4.7) — entire monorepos fit in a single context.
- **Subagents (`.claude/agents/`)** — specialized agent definitions (test-runner, security-reviewer, db-migrator).
- **Hooks (`settings.json`)** — lifecycle automation (pre-tool, post-tool, stop).
- **MCP server consumption** — GitHub, Linear, Postgres, etc.
- **Worktrees + parallel agents** — isolated work under `.claude/worktrees/*`.
- **Slash commands** — `/clear`, `/compact`, `/mcp`, `/agents`, `/hooks`.

**Philosophy.** Claude Code is not designed to replace the IDE but to do what the IDE cannot: **multi-file refactor, large-context analysis, agentic workflow**.

### 2.2. Cursor — IDE-First Composer

Cursor started as a VS Code fork and grew into an independent AI IDE from Anysphere. In 2025 it announced **Composer 2.5**, an in-house model — a strategic move to reduce dependence on Anthropic and OpenAI.

**Core capabilities:**
- **Composer 2.5** — Anysphere's own model, $0.50 input / $2.50 output per M tokens. SWE-bench Verified 71.2%.
- **Multi-model** — Claude Sonnet 4.6/Opus 4.7, GPT-5, Gemini 3, Composer 2.5.
- **Inline edit (Cmd+K)** — select code, request a change.
- **Chat panel (Cmd+L)** — chat + agent mode.
- **Composer (Cmd+I)** — multi-file generation + refactor.
- **Parallel agents (2026)** — 3-5 tasks running concurrently.
- **Worktrees + BugBot** — automated PR review agent.
- **`.cursor/rules`** — repo-level instructions applied to every prompt.

**Philosophy.** Cursor keeps the "AI comes to the developer" approach — you live in your IDE while AI capabilities live alongside.

### 2.3. Windsurf — Cascade Flow Paradigm

Windsurf is the November 2024 rebrand of Codeium. By 2026 it differentiates with the **Cascade** flow paradigm.

**Core capabilities:**
- **Cascade** — fluid switching between "write mode" (autonomous code generation), "chat mode," and "command mode" (CLI invocation).
- **Multi-model** — Claude, GPT, Gemini.
- **Supercomplete** — more aggressive multi-line completion than Copilot.
- **Memory** — preferences and patterns learned across the project.
- **`.codeiumignore`** — paths excluded from context.

**Philosophy.** Windsurf champions "AI flow" — minimize friction between developer and AI, less clicking, more speaking.

## 3. Feature Comparison

<comparison-table data-caption="Claude Code vs Cursor vs Windsurf (May 2026)" data-headers="[&quot;Feature&quot;,&quot;Claude Code&quot;,&quot;Cursor&quot;,&quot;Windsurf&quot;]" data-rows="[{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Type&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;Terminal/CLI&quot;,&quot;IDE (VS Code fork)&quot;,&quot;IDE (VS Code fork)&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Default Model&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;Sonnet 4.6 / Opus 4.7&quot;,&quot;Composer 2.5&quot;,&quot;Sonnet 4.6&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Max Context&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;1M (Opus 4.7)&quot;,&quot;200K (Composer) / 1M (Claude)&quot;,&quot;200K&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Agent Mode&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;Native subagents&quot;,&quot;Composer + parallel agents&quot;,&quot;Cascade flow&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Hooks/Automation&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;Full (settings.json)&quot;,&quot;Limited&quot;,&quot;None&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;MCP Support&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;Full&quot;,&quot;Full&quot;,&quot;Full&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Worktree/Parallel&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;Native&quot;,&quot;New (2026)&quot;,&quot;No&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;BugBot/Review&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;Via subagent&quot;,&quot;Native&quot;,&quot;No&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Pricing (Pro)&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;$20/$100/$200&quot;,&quot;Free/$20/$40&quot;,&quot;$0/$15/$30&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Offline&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;No&quot;,&quot;No&quot;,&quot;No&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Hooks API&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;pre/post/stop&quot;,&quot;No&quot;,&quot;No&quot;]}]"></comparison-table>

## 4. Setup

### Claude Code

~~~bash
npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code
claude                 # auth + start in cwd
claude --continue      # resume last session
claude --print "..."   # one-shot mode for scripts
~~~

Configuration files: `~/.claude.json`, `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md`, `<repo>/CLAUDE.md`, `<repo>/.claude/settings.json`, `<repo>/.claude/agents/*.md`.

### Cursor

Install from cursor.com. Three key shortcuts: **Cmd+L (chat)**, **Cmd+K (inline edit)**, **Cmd+I (composer)**. Enable BugBot via settings + GitHub app. Repo-level rules in `.cursor/rules`.

### Windsurf

Download from codeium.com/windsurf. Free tier covers most use; Pro $15/mo. `.codeiumignore` for exclusions; Cascade panel appears on the right.

## 5. Performance: SWE-bench, Speed, Quality

### SWE-bench Verified

<comparison-table data-caption="SWE-bench Verified Scores (May 2026)" data-headers="[&quot;Model/Agent&quot;,&quot;Score&quot;,&quot;Vendor&quot;,&quot;Date&quot;]" data-rows="[{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Claude Opus 4.7 + Code Agent&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;82.4%&quot;,&quot;Anthropic&quot;,&quot;2026-Q1&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Claude Sonnet 4.6 + Code Agent&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;79.6%&quot;,&quot;Anthropic&quot;,&quot;2025-Q4&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;GPT-5 + OpenAI Codex&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;78.1%&quot;,&quot;OpenAI&quot;,&quot;2026-Q1&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Gemini 3 Pro + Jules&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;73.5%&quot;,&quot;Google&quot;,&quot;2026-Q1&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;Cursor Composer 2.5&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;71.2%&quot;,&quot;Anysphere&quot;,&quot;2026-Q1&quot;]},{&quot;feature&quot;:&quot;GPT-4o + Default Agent&quot;,&quot;values&quot;:[&quot;54.8%&quot;,&quot;OpenAI&quot;,&quot;2024-Q4&quot;]}]"></comparison-table>

<stat-callout data-value="82.4%" data-context="Claude Opus 4.7 + Code Agent on SWE-bench Verified" data-outcome="took the top score as of May 2026 — 82.4% success rate on real-world bug fixes." data-source="{&quot;label&quot;:&quot;Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 Technical Report&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/claude-opus-4-7&quot;,&quot;date&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;}"></stat-callout>

### SWE-bench Pro (harder subset)

- Claude Opus 4.7 Pro: 45.9%
- GPT-5 Pro: 42.1%
- Sonnet 4.6 Pro: 39.4%
- Cursor Composer 2.5 Pro: 31.7%

On complex tasks Opus 4.7 and GPT-5 pull ahead; Composer 2.5 is competitive in simpler tasks but trails on hard ones.

### Response Time

- **Cursor Composer 2.5:** Fastest (in-house, low latency). Inline edit < 1s.
- **Windsurf Supercomplete:** Very fast (~500ms).
- **Claude Code (Sonnet 4.6):** Fast (~2-4s first byte).
- **Claude Code (Opus 4.7, deep think):** Slower (~10-30s for agent tasks).

For senior developers, "correct first time" > "finish fast." Opus 4.7's higher one-shot success rate often beats faster but flakier alternatives.

## 6. Turkish Angle: Adoption and KVKK

### SMB vs Enterprise

**SMB (5-30 devs):** Cursor Pro $20/dev + Claude Pro $20/dev → $40/dev/month.

**Mid-market (30-150 devs):** Cursor Business $40 + Claude Max 5x $100 → $140/dev/month. SSO, audit log, team management.

**Enterprise (150+ devs):** Cursor Enterprise + Claude Max 20x $200 → ~$240+/dev/month. Self-hosted option (Claude EU via Bedrock/Azure), pre-approved MCP list, KVKK officer involvement.

### KVKK and Data Residency

Critical questions:
1. **Does the code contain personal data?** If prompts include customer data or PII, that is a **cross-border transfer**.
2. **Where is the cloud?** Default US; EU instance available (Claude Bedrock EU, Azure OpenAI EU).
3. **Consent?** Developers are employees, but customer data in prompts requires explicit consent.
4. **Audit log?** Every AI call (who, when, prompt, response) must be retained.

**Practical solution.** Self-hosted Claude (Bedrock Turkey region — upcoming), PII masking layer, enterprise SSO + DLP.

## 7. Case Studies: 3 Turkish Dev Teams (Anonymized)

### Case 1 — Fintech Scale-up (Istanbul, 65 devs)

**Profile.** Series-B mobile banking startup. Node.js + Postgres + React Native + AWS.

**Choice.** Cursor Business + Claude Code Max.

**Why Cursor?** 90% of daily work in-IDE — feature flags, small refactor, tests. BugBot auto-reviews PRs; junior PR quality jumped dramatically.

**Why Claude Code?** Big refactors (monolith-to-microservice), migration scripts, multi-file analysis — Cursor falls short here. Seniors use Claude Code 5-10 hrs/week.

**Cost.** $240/dev × 65 = $15,600/mo. ROI: +40% ticket throughput over 3 months.

### Case 2 — SMB E-commerce Shop (Bursa, 18 devs)

**Profile.** B2B e-commerce platform, Django + Vue. Half senior, half junior.

**Choice.** Cursor Pro for everyone + Claude Pro for 4 seniors only.

**Why?** Budget-constrained. Cursor Pro covers Composer 2.5 use. Seniors top up with Claude Pro for complex agent work.

**Cost.** ($20 × 18) + ($20 × 4) = $440/mo, ~$24 per head.

**Result.** Juniors flatten learning curve with Cursor inline edit. Seniors compressed release cycle from biweekly to weekly with Claude Code.

### Case 3 — Enterprise Bank (Ankara, 340 devs)

**Profile.** Major Turkish bank (BDDK regulated). Java Spring + Oracle + COBOL legacy.

**Choice.** Cursor Enterprise + Claude Code Max **self-hosted**.

**Why self-hosted?** KVKK + BDDK essentially forbid sending customer data abroad. They run Claude EU on AWS Bedrock Turkey region + on-prem Cursor enterprise.

**Cost.** ~$400/dev/month including infra; ~$1.6M/year total. ROI: BDDK reporting automation alone saves $2M+/year in labor.

## 8. Risks: Vibe Coding, Lock-in, Security

### Vibe Coding

Karpathy's 2025 term — trusting model "vibe" without understanding — is contentious. A Microsoft Source analysis showed juniors lose 30% code quality with vibe coding; seniors gain 12%.

**Rule.** Accept AI output **with understanding**, not just visual plausibility. Senior devs validate by logic, not just by tests passing.

### Lock-in

Cursor's `.cursor/rules`, Windsurf's `Memory`, Claude Code's `.claude/agents/` — all tool-specific. Switching loses the investment.

**Mitigation.** Keep tool-neutral AI instructions (e.g., `CLAUDE.md`) and auto-convert to each tool's format.

### Security: Code Leakage and Prompt Injection

Default AI assistants ship your code to the cloud. Risk vectors:
- **IP leakage** (sensitive business logic, valuable to competitors).
- **Customer PII leakage** (KVKK violation).
- **Credential exposure** (accidental API keys in prompts).

**Mitigation.** Developer DLP training, pre-commit secret scanning (gitleaks, trufflehog), enterprise accounts with user-level policy, self-hosted options.

## 9. The Hybrid Setup: Optimal Configuration for Senior Devs

About **85% of senior developers run a hybrid setup**:

1. **Daily IDE flow:** Cursor (inline edit, autocomplete, chat).
2. **Heavy work (multi-file refactor, research, agent):** Claude Code terminal.
3. **Optional fast completion:** Windsurf Supercomplete.

~~~bash
# Cursor stays open all day
# Claude Code ready in a side terminal
alias cc='claude --continue'

# Keep both .cursor/rules and CLAUDE.md in the repo
# .mcp.json — same MCP servers consumed by both tools
~~~

Each tool wins different work. Cursor preserves flow inside the IDE; Claude Code dominates agent and long-context work; Windsurf wins on raw completion speed.

## 10. Frequently Asked Questions

<callout-box data-variant="answer" data-title="Junior developer — Claude Code or Cursor?">

**Cursor.** Living in the IDE is more natural for juniors than switching to a terminal. Inline edit + chat smooths the learning curve. Move to Claude Code once you're senior.

</callout-box>

<callout-box data-variant="answer" data-title="Composer 2.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6?">

**Depends on task type.** Iterative coding (autocomplete, inline edit): Composer 2.5 is cheaper and faster. Complex tasks (multi-file, agent, deep analysis): Sonnet 4.6 wins on quality. Cursor's "Auto" mode picks one based on the task.

</callout-box>

<callout-box data-variant="answer" data-title="Is Windsurf dead?">

**No.** Market share is small (~8%) but Cascade has a loyal base. Free tier is competitive; popular among juniors and students. In enterprise, Cursor + Claude Code dominate.

</callout-box>

<callout-box data-variant="answer" data-title="Where does GitHub Copilot stand?">

**Behind.** Copilot still has scale (5M+ users) but lost the enterprise senior segment to Cursor and Claude Code. SWE-bench Verified: Copilot ~52%, Cursor 71%+. GitHub Copilot Workspace is the catch-up play.

</callout-box>

<callout-box data-variant="answer" data-title="Safest KVKK setup?">

**Self-hosted Claude (Bedrock EU/TR) + Cursor Enterprise + mandatory PII masking + audit logging.** Three layers: pre-prompt masking, minimized cross-border transfer, full auditability.

</callout-box>

<callout-box data-variant="answer" data-title="$20/month or $200/month?">

**$20 Pro covers 90% of users.** Daily heavy AI users (e.g., tech leads spending 5h/day in AI), 1M context users, or agent-heavy workflows: Max 5x $100. Max 20x $200 only for full-day autonomous agents.

</callout-box>

<callout-box data-variant="answer" data-title="What are worktrees and how to use them?">

**Git worktrees** let you check out multiple branches of a single repo into parallel directories. Claude Code creates them under `.claude/worktrees/<branch>` automatically — parallel agents can work on different tasks without collisions. Cursor added similar support in 2026.

</callout-box>

<callout-box data-variant="answer" data-title="Does MCP work in all three?">

**Yes.** All three consume the MCP standard; the same server config drops into each. This is the most important lock-in mitigator in the ecosystem.

</callout-box>

## 11. Next Steps

To clarify your AI coding assistant setup or design an adoption strategy for your team:

1. **Tool Selection Workshop.** Team profile, task mix, budget, KVKK requirements — clarified in 3 hours; output: team-specific tool stack recommendation.
2. **AI Adoption Program.** A 30-90 day structured rollout — pilot, training, measurement, scale-up. Productivity metrics and ROI analysis.
3. **Hybrid Setup Training.** Two-day hands-on workshop for senior developers on Claude Code + Cursor + MCP.

Use the contact form on the site to reach out.

<references-list data-items="[{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Claude Code Documentation&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Anthropic&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2025&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Anthropic&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Claude Opus 4.7 Technical Report&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/claude-opus-4-7&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Anthropic&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Anthropic&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Cursor Documentation&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://docs.cursor.com/&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Anysphere&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Cursor&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Cursor Composer 2.5 Announcement&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2-5&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Anysphere&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2025&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Cursor&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Windsurf Editor — Cascade Paradigm&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://codeium.com/windsurf&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Codeium&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2024&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Codeium&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;SWE-bench Verified Leaderboard&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.swebench.com/&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Princeton NLP&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Princeton&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;SWE-bench Pro Subset&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.swebench.com/pro&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Princeton NLP&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2025&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Princeton&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Andrej Karpathy — Vibe Coding&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://twitter.com/karpathy/status/1758340862568833115&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Andrej Karpathy&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2025&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;X (Twitter)&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Microsoft Source: AI Coding Productivity Study&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/ai/ai-coding-productivity/&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Microsoft&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2025&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Microsoft&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Lush Binary — Cursor vs Claude Code Deep Dive&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://lushbinary.com/cursor-vs-claude-code&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Lush Binary&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2025&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Lush Binary&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Scrimba — Senior Dev AI Workflow&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://scrimba.com/blog/senior-dev-ai-workflow&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Scrimba&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2025&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Scrimba&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;NX Code — Cursor Composer Benchmarks&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://nx.dev/blog/cursor-composer-benchmark&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;NX&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Nx&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;DEV.to — Windsurf Cascade Review&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://dev.to/windsurf-cascade-review&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;DEV Community&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2025&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;DEV.to&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Cursor.com Blog — Parallel Agents&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://cursor.com/blog/parallel-agents&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Anysphere&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Cursor&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Anthropic Pricing Page&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/pricing&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Anthropic&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Anthropic&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Cursor Pricing&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://cursor.com/pricing&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Anysphere&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Cursor&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Windsurf Pricing&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://codeium.com/pricing&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Codeium&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Codeium&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;GitHub Copilot Documentation&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://docs.github.com/en/copilot&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;GitHub&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;GitHub&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;OpenAI Codex Documentation&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://platform.openai.com/docs/codex&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;OpenAI&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;OpenAI&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;KVKK - Law No. 6698&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.kvkk.gov.tr/&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Republic of Türkiye - KVKK&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2016-04-07&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Republic of Türkiye&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;AWS Bedrock Anthropic&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://aws.amazon.com/bedrock/anthropic-claude/&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;AWS&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;AWS&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Anthropic Claude Code GitHub&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Anthropic&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;GitHub&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;BDDK — Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.bddk.org.tr/&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Republic of Türkiye - BDDK&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2025&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Republic of Türkiye&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Continue.dev Open Source Alternative&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://continue.dev/&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Continue Dev&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2026&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Continue&quot;},{&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Aider — Terminal AI Pair Programmer&quot;,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://aider.chat/&quot;,&quot;author&quot;:&quot;Aider&quot;,&quot;publishedAt&quot;:&quot;2025&quot;,&quot;publisher&quot;:&quot;Aider&quot;}]"></references-list>

---

This guide is a living document; the AI coding assistant market (model version updates, new features, price changes) evolves rapidly, so it is **refreshed every two months**.